再保险:候选人编号方案

一22点-0400 5/17/99,Steven m . Christey写道:> Spaf说:> > >为什么不让每一个考号之类的“临时- 99 - 01”> >我们只是从今年年初数?> >这个方法需要一个中央“分配”机制>不同实体使用重复的数字,并可能有点>问题或昂贵的实现,如果作业>每个人开放,不仅输入论坛。这很容易自动化。建立一个程序,分配下一个数一致回应电子邮件从一个“授权”的记者。这样做也可以从万维网页面需要密码访问,或支持ssl的访问。我们不关心数据分配和下降,或相同的漏洞给两个不同的数字由两个不同的人。毕竟,这是简单的试图分配独特的临时编号为评价。,这种方法有助于鼓励人们不要参考临时编号为长。> >基因,你提倡公众使用的候选人编号方案>呢?如果是这样,你相信temp - 99 - 01年真的没有>机会成为事实上的标准? I think that the first number >to be referenced could become the one that is most commonly used, even >if it has a "temp" name in it. However, as long as "highly visible" >players use the CVE name (i.e. database owners, advisory writers, >etc.), then I suppose it becomes less of a problem. See my comments above. I think that it is worth trying using something like this. If we spend too much time debating the exact syntax and mechanics, we will never get a system out there to try! --spaf