最终稿吗?

清单写道:>“自”是指“时间”这个词,而不是因果关系。大抓! ! !新变化:*取代了“自”一词暗示——见aragraphs 2和5 *进一步加强2日森泰斯在第二段-取代的教育…专家可能阻碍”与“教育……专家将会阻碍”Spaf提供:>我不相信这封信需要进一步缩短。我认为>它是准备好了。我同意。——= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =戴夫·曼| |电子邮件:dmann@bos.bindview.com高级安全分析师| |电话:508-485-7737 x254 BindView公司| |传真:508-485-0737 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =问候:作为主要安全从业者,教育者,供应商和用户的信息安全,我们希望注册担忧欧洲理事会的条约草案犯罪在网络空间。我们担心的部分提出条约可能导致起诉技术和软件常用的计算机系统抗攻击。签署州通过立法来实现该条约可能危及安全的计算机系统,因为这些国家的电脑用户将无法充分保护自己的电脑系统和信息保护的教育专家将受阻。 Critical to the protection of computer systems and infrastructure is the ability to * Test software for weaknesses * Verify the presence of defects in computer systems * Exchange vulnerability information System administrators, researchers, consultants and companies all routinely develop, use, and share software designed to exercise known and suspected vulnerabilities. Academic institutions use these tools to educate students and in research to develop improved defenses. Our combined experience suggests that it is impossible to reliably distinguish software used in computer crime from that used for these legitimate purposes. In fact, they are often identical. Currently, article 6 of the draft treaty is vague regarding the use, distribution, and possession of software that could be used to violate the security of computer systems. We agree that damaging or breaking into computer systems is wrong and we unequivocally support laws against such inappropriate behavior. We affirm that a goal of the treaty and resulting legislation should be to permit the development and application of good security measures. However, legislation that criminalizes security software development, distribution and use is counter to that goal, as it would adversely impact security practitioners, researchers, and educators. Therefore, we respectfully request that the treaty drafters remove section a.1 from article 6, and modify section b accordingly; the articles on computer intrusion and damage (viz., articles 1-5) are already sufficient to proscribe any improper use of security-related software or information. Please do not hesitate to call on us for technical advice in your future deliberations. Signed,