回复：CVE ID语法投票 - 结果和下一步

-----开始PGP签名消息------哈希：2013-04-18 22:34，布斯，哈罗德写道：|我还将在没有领先零的选项B中添加，|包括少于四位数字，可用的过渡|如果CVE标识符从1000开始，则第一年（或更多）。直到第9000届CVE工具将成功地掌握|每个人都有更多的过渡时间。这可以允许更多|时间取决于最终创建的CVE数量。而|带有填充的选项a没有这样的过渡，无论如何| number of digits are agreed to are included in every CVE from the | beginning (in 2014?). For the sake of further discussion, by no means an official set of choices... Option D: Seven numeric characters with leading zeros. Option E: Twelve numeric characters, no leading zeros. Option F: Twelve numeric characters, no leading zeros, starting at 1000 for each year. Option G: Infinite numeric characters, no leading zeros, starting at 1000 for each year. I picked 12 because someone suggested 10+. I'm also saying "numeric characters" to raise the issue of treating everything after "CVE" or "CVE-YYYY" as a string. Not sure that capping it makes much difference. Not sure this covers all the recently discussed options. Also not sure how to handle this situation procedurally? Declare a mistrial and prepare another ballot, after further discussion? ~ - Art -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -http://www.enigmail.net/ieyearecaayfalfwxdoacgkqk/8fedbcakopegcgcgcgnbanjbjqesdrgzibfekbfekbwhgy zvkaokashlkb4sydnp+kd3buslenerhb = wclt = wclt --------------------------