回复：在此列表中发布有任何问题吗？请回复

看来我收到的电子邮件与布莱恩（Brian）相同。我收到的两个（堪萨斯城皇家时间，又名CDT）：摘要：从：所有者cve-eeditorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org <所有者cve-eeditorial-board-list-list-list@lists.mitre.org>代表肯特（Kent）的兰德菲尔德（Landfield）：所有者cve-eeditorial-board@list.mitre.org <所有者cve-eeditorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org>代表jericho 发送：8月30日，星期日, 2015 1:14 AM To: cve-editorial-board-list Subject: current guidelines for a CNA Regards, kw ________________________________________ From: owner-cve-editorial-board-list@lists.mitre.org 代表Jericho 发送：2015年8月30日，星期日，下午10:35至：Christey，Steven M. CC：CVE-EDITORIAL-BOARD-LIST-LIST-LIST-LIST-LIST-LIST-LIST-LIST-LIST-LIST-LIST-LIST-LIST-LIST-LIST-LIST-LIST-LIST-LIST主题：回复：发布此列表的任何问题吗？请回答：1。从8月28日（星期五）开始，有人收到了此列表的帖子：来自Brian Martin（Jericho）和Kent Landfield？肯特，您看到了：Brian的帖子吗？布莱恩，你看到肯特的帖子了吗？我收到了肯特的邮件。我没有收到“重新：惩罚或撤销CNA身份的程序？”邮件。 I did not receive my follow-up made shortly after. I did receive my "current guidelines for a CNA" mail. So 50/50 on receiving... : 2. Did anybody receive this message? And this one obviously. : Brian's implication seems very clear, namely, that MITRE would prevent : his posts from being sent to the Board list and/or being archived. As : long as I have been the primary person responsible for configuration of : the CVE Editorial Board list, beginning in spring 1999, I have always : given Board members unmoderated/unlimited posting privileges to this : list. Any implication that I would intentionally moderate this list or : restrict posts to Board members is incorrect. I apologize for that. Based on what I saw, it seemed clear at the time that some type of moderation was at play, primarily due to the inflamatory nature of my post that did not go through, as compared to my tame question post that did. .b