Re:横切的主题/董事会透明度

斯科特,星期四,2017年5月11日,斯科特Lawler写道:我分享更多的透明度的担忧是必要的。这是一个:很明显的问题。::然而,还有硬币的另一面需要考虑。董事会:来帮助这样的横切响应请求。:就我个人而言,我会提交一些时间帮助工艺对国会的反应:如果需要。至少,我们可以帮助编辑提供的草稿:斜方。斜方已经响应这个请求或不吗?::只是让我们知道你需要我们的帮助。需要斜方是透明的。这不是真的“硬币的另一面”。 If they are transparent, they bring it the board, and we do our 'advisory role' collectively. Your wording implies that board failed somehow, when we weren't given any of that information until I brought it up, to the pain and headache of MITRE. I forced their hand, after giving them almost three weeks to bring it up despite my "two day" deadline. If that isn't a real picture into how MITRE operates, and how they see the value of the board? Not sure what is. .b